Exciting position sex

I read your article, and see nothing in it to change my mind.

Yes, but had good reason. Can't say why on open thread though.

Make sure to towel off after

your postings are most helpful.

Harper had a minority government and was forced to spend by the opposition parties. They wanted to spend even more than he did.

I'm confused....are you trying to ask people to touch your nuts?

I know who he married. As for the rest... if the evidence is so strong. Why isn't he in a huge legal battle like Cosby's?

It is a victory for freedom as a principle, and for human rights. Nobody should be forced to do what is insulting for his moral standards.

If he knew what we know now, he'd be more sure than ever he was right. he got a few things wrong, but he was spot on that evolution happens.

The Word of God.

Perhaps you should spend less time insulting people and more time looking up all the things you don't know?

Pilot: It will be clear skies the whole ride

I read the link and I really don't agree with her assertion about why the National Anthem is problematic. Rye bases that on a part of a poem, upon which the National Anthem is based, which is about a British force of escaped black slaves being killed when they fought with the British in the battle of Fort McHenry. I might agree with her if those escaped slaves had been forced, or coerced in some way, to join forces with the British. But the article says that they were recruited, not forced or coerced, to fight with the British. With her being black, I can understand her not liking the idea of escaped slaves being killed but they took up arms, apparently of their own free will, against the American military, and I'm sure that they must have known that, in doing so, they risked being killed. So, under the circumstances, I don't see what's problematic here. When you freely join forces with an invading foreign military force, against the US military, I can't shed any tears for you, if you die, even if you are an escaped slave.

Or the lost city of gold.

KD. You do not invalidate squat, especially my existence. you seem to be rather into your faith in the supernatural superstitions.the fact that you can debate and to rationalize your views as I guess most of us usually do .

So, just so you understand what you are saying: You believe that it is OK for a parent to kill their child or children, whether the child is within or outside the mother's body; that it is OK for a larger human being/adult to impose their will on a weaker child which results in the child's death. That is what you are saying, am I understanding correctly?

Nunu. My no-no place.

You declared I must be against interracial marriage. There is no basis for that.